Skip Bayless Needs a History Lesson
I stayed at home sick with food poisoning yesterday, and spent much of the afternoon experiencing the joys of day-time TV. While flipping through channels, I landed on ESPN’s First Take in the middle of a discussion between Jemele Hill and Skip Bayless on the role of race in college football coaching hires. This issue centered around claims that Florida Gators defensive coordinator Charlie Strong hasn’t received a head coaching offer (especially from southern schools) in 25 years of coaching due largely to the fact that he is a black man with a white wife. This, of course, follows hotly on the heels of Auburn University’s recent deplorable decision to hire Iowa State head coach Gene Chizik, who is white, over the far-more qualified University at Buffalo head coach Turner Gill, who is black and, like Strong, has a white wife. Charles Barkley threw even more fuel on the fire by publicly and stridently denouncing his alma mater’s decision as blatantly racist.
Jemele Hill basically argued that Strong’s interracial marriage played a huge role in his inability to land a head coaching job, particularly in the south. Bayless countered that he was, and I’m paraphrasing, disheartened to hear this kind of talk despite the fact that Barack Obama was just elected president, as the son of a black father and a white mother. Furthermore, he said he could make the argument that being a black coach with a white wife might actually help a someone like Strong land a coaching job in the south, as it would make those white athetlic boosters and white AD’s feel more comfortable interacting with them.
Jemele Hill handled this comment extremely well, saying that she firmly disagreed, and that to understand this you really have to know the history of the south. That up until fairly recently, interracial dating was illegal in the south, and that there’s a long legacy of extremely emotional resistance to interracial relationships. I’ve been a long-time fan of Hill’s columns on ESPN (see her coverage of a racially-charged LeBron James photoshoot), and was even more impressed to hear her thoughtfulness on television.
So, to recap: Skip Bayless thinks that a black man having a white wife would actually work to put white southerners at ease. I’m always cautious about getting up on my historical high horse and saying “you need a history lesson,” but in this case? Skip, you need to get yourself a f’ing history lesson:
Emmit Till was murdered for whistling at a white woman 53 years ago.
Loving v. Virginia overturned state anti-miscegenation laws 41 years ago.
The list of states whose laws were no longer enforceable due to the decision? Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. Do you notice a pattern there, Skip?
Alabama officially removed its ban on interracial marriage 8 years ago.
The final tally in the Alabama Senate? 60-40. As recently as eight years ago, FORTY senators in the state of Alabama, home to the above-mentioned Auburn University, voted AGAINST removing a ban on interracial marriage.
Barack Obama’s election was uplifting, and has the potential to do more to bind this nation’s racial wounds as any event in the past forty years. But it’s frustrating to hear (mostly white) people like Skip Bayless using it as a trump card to de-legitimatize claims of racism. “What do you mean someone wasn’t hired because they’re black? Didn’t our country just elect a black president?” The results of one election cannot magically erase centuries of racial trauma, and our country still has a long, long way to go.
It’s history. Learn it, Skip.


You’ve nailed two problems right on the head:
1. People who don’t understand the history of the south [or have not lived in the south] have no effin clue. When I moved from California–>Colorado–>Michigan–>Virginia–>Tennessee in the 1990s, I was struck by the lack of interracial dating/marriage. It was that obvious.
2. Younger people, especially, who have come of age in the past 15-20 years have no clue, because for many of them, even in the south, interracial dating is no big deal.
#2 is good, I suppose, but it still doesn’t trump #1. And it doesn’t trump the fact that in things like the situation you describe so well, those are people who came of age in an earlier time.
AndrewMc
January 15, 2009 at 8:16 am
I’d be curious to know just how much generational attitudes towards interracial dating have changed in past 15-20 years. Are younger people really that much more tolerant of interracial dating? I’d like to think so, but I’m not so sure…
Cameron Blevins
January 15, 2009 at 10:54 am
Black people are the most racist people in the country.
Timothy
November 25, 2009 at 9:56 am
Timothy, it would great to hear some reasoning behind that.
Cameron Blevins
November 25, 2009 at 10:43 am
Cameron, the statement is just my personal opinion from my life experiences.
Timothy
November 25, 2009 at 11:52 am
Sorry to hear that, but I’d think twice about making generalizations about millions of people based on your own personal experiences.
Cameron Blevins
November 25, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Cameron, I guess you don’t have a problem with Charles Barkley’s generalizations that white people don’t know anything about sports. I find it sad that black people can say anything they want without any reprecussions. A double standard indeed. Charles Barlley is a racist and a poor role model. As for my generalizations, I call it like I see it.
Timothy
November 26, 2009 at 8:24 am
Not sure which generalizations you’re talking about, but to extrapolate from Charles Barkley to black people as a whole is quite a leap. And I know he’s gotten in a ton of hot water over his comments on race, so I don’t see how he doesn’t suffer any repercussions. I’ve got more of a problem with the fact that he’s got a gambling problem and a DUI.
Cameron Blevins
November 26, 2009 at 8:46 am
I moved from the suburbs to the inner city when I was 14. I had no opinions of black people. I was treated the same by both white & black people prior to moving. After moving I was harrassed & threatened on a daily basis by blacks. My house was broken into six different times by blacks. My parents cars twice. Harrassed at predominately black schools daily. All because of the color of my skin. Is this not racism. This is how I can make my generalizations which I will clarify. Not all black people are racists, just the majoity of black people that I have come in contact with on a daily basis. As for Charles, you left out infidelity.
Timothy
November 26, 2009 at 9:28 am
Timothy,
You are right on all accounts. Stay true to your words. Just remember as well, that not all black people are racist though.
I am not.
Thomas
October 7, 2010 at 10:15 am