<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AHA-ing (Saturday Recap)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historying.org/2009/01/05/aha-ing-saturday-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historying.org/2009/01/05/aha-ing-saturday-recap/</link>
	<description>thoughts on scholarship and history in a digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Blevins</title>
		<link>http://historying.org/2009/01/05/aha-ing-saturday-recap/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron Blevins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historying.org/?p=526#comment-173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy just about any conversation where I don&#039;t have to first explain &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; digital history is. 

Good point about applied digital history. I think that&#039;s the first step towards integrating digital methodology into the broader academy - once it becomes a part of the landscape, then it will probably be easier to have a widely-recognized research agenda for the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy just about any conversation where I don&#8217;t have to first explain <em>what</em> digital history is. </p>
<p>Good point about applied digital history. I think that&#8217;s the first step towards integrating digital methodology into the broader academy &#8211; once it becomes a part of the landscape, then it will probably be easier to have a widely-recognized research agenda for the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phdinhistory</title>
		<link>http://historying.org/2009/01/05/aha-ing-saturday-recap/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phdinhistory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historying.org/?p=526#comment-171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad you found our conversation enjoyable.  I was worried that I was talking your ear off and keeping you from a panel.

So what do you think about the future of digital history after your experiences at the conference?  So much of what you witnessed is applied digital history in my opinion.  What I would like to see is the emergence of a widely recognized research agenda for digital history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you found our conversation enjoyable.  I was worried that I was talking your ear off and keeping you from a panel.</p>
<p>So what do you think about the future of digital history after your experiences at the conference?  So much of what you witnessed is applied digital history in my opinion.  What I would like to see is the emergence of a widely recognized research agenda for digital history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

